Saturday, August 20, 2011

Book Review: Willful Blindness


Willful Blindness: Why We Ignore the Obvious at Our Peril, by Margaret Heffernan; 2011, Walker & Company, New York.
According to the bio on her book jacket, Margaret Heffernan is a former producer for BBC radio and TV and has been CEO of several interactive media companies. She came across the term “willful blindness” in the transcript of the Enron trial, and it so interested her that she eventually wrote this book about it. The term “willful blindness” means “you are responsible if you could have known, and should have known, something that instead you strove not to see (p. 2).” It matters not whether this avoidance was conscious or not. As with so many books, the subtitle makes the point. This becomes a communication topic because none of us can reach an audience that will not listen.
Heffernan goes on to examine in detail ten important causes of willful blindness, with examples ranging from match.com’s use of affinity (like attracts like) to the role of fatigue in the disastrous explosion at BP’s Texas City oil refinery to the factor of being too sure of one’s ideas in the collapse of the world economy.  She makes interesting connections by means of these causes. For example, Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, held onto the idea that “free, competitive markets are by far the unrivaled way to organize economies (quoted on p. 59)” long after the derivatives market endangered the economy in ways that he, of all observers, should have seen. He chose to hold onto what he already believed rather than see the facts in front of his face, a trait he shares with much of the world’s population, including some folks who believed that an alien space ship would save them from a world-ending flood back in 1954. Even after their entire prophecy proved false, most of them continued to believe, just as many American politicians continue to believe in “free, competitive markets” today.
Heffernan uses a chapter to examine each of the ten causes of willful blindness, and then gives us hope by including a chapter on people who do not blind themselves and one more chapter on ways to reduce one’s own blindness. Heffernan weaves her stories together very neatly around her themes, never losing track of the need to keep the reader involved. She uses a wide range of history and research to support her ideas, but this book reads far better than an academic paper. (Following up the endnotes is optional.) She gives a good bibliography and index, each of which increases the academic value and believability of Willful Blindness.
If you ever ask, “What was he thinking?” or “How could they not know?” read this book.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Willful Blindness

According to a book of the same name, "willful blindness" is a legal term for ". . . the idea that there is an opportunity for knowledge, and a responsibility to be infomed, but it is shirked." (Willful Blindness, by Margaret Heffernan, copyright 2011; Walker Publishing Company: New York.) I am still reading the book, and learning from it. The first three chapters discuss important reasons people ignore or fail to process important information. Expect a book review when I finish the reading. Unfortunately, that must take a back seat to my college courses, but I will persist.

I hope the importance of this to communication hits readers here immediately. Talking to people who fail to listen even if your subject affects them wastes your time and energy. Finding ways through the barriers stands to improve your communication skills much more than using "might" rather than "may" when some expert deems that appropriate.

Stay tuned for further discussions of this and related subjects.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

You can take back anything you say . . .

In fact, many organizations and some people take back almost everything they say. You can do so at any time by taking actions that fail to match your words. For example, I attend a "university," which will remain nameless for now. They say wonderful things in their heavy advertising, including the front page of the web site. Then they go and cancel that in so many ways: by having a low graduation rate, some instructors not suitable to teach, many courses  and course web pages apparently prepared by amateurs, and allowing the public to believe they are not accredited (they are). I imagine most readers could give more examples of this. Hypocrisy costs a person or organization in more than morality and ethics; people who could not function at this school are giving their friends, relatives, and blog or social-networking readers word of mouth that the marketing department cannot overcome by words. Hence the heavy, expensive, advertising.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Only a thousand words?

  Pictures are often worth more than a thousand words, but they usually need words to explain them. In this case, the words explained why European airspace was being closed after the eruption poured a huge amount of volcanic ash into the air.
Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland from Boston.com April 2010

Communication as my subject



Because I specialize in communication and my major field is Organizational Communication, I have decided to focus this blog on communication. That’s a broad field; it may narrow over time, or I may continue looking at anything involving communication successes, failures, or methods. If communicating fascinates you as much as it does me, we’ll both enjoy this!

Monday, October 4, 2010

Another new course

This one is called Sociology of Work. It officially started September 27, but some unknown thing happened and the instructor has been replaced, a new adventure for me. All the same, I really enjoy sociology courses, and work especially fascinates me. I have done the first week's work and begun the second week. So far, so good.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

"Popular Culture" class

Please be advised that I will be using this blog for a "popular culture" class for the next six weeks. Apologies to any regular readers.